Shell layering
Ownership chains of three or more hops that terminate in a designated party.
3+ hops · 3 jurisdictions
Screening against 50,000+ lists, transaction monitoring over the resolved network, and fraud in the same case file — three lines that nest, and one immutable record with the reasoning, the source and the analyst signature.
50K+
Lists in scope
195
Jurisdictions
7 yr
Auditable retention
Nordwind Handels GmbH
DE-HRB-8839210045 · Hamburg, DE · inc. 2016
Score decomposition
Audit trail
14:31:52 — matched EU CFSP 2023/1214, entry 118
14:32:04 — ownership path resolved, 3 hops
14:32:07 — narrative drafted, awaiting analyst signature
Section 02 · Coverage
A single call opens the whole fan. Each family returns its own weight, and that weight travels with the decision into the file.
50K+
Lists in scope, refreshed in minutes rather than days.
195
Jurisdictions with searchable corporate registries.
<100ms
Screening response at the 95th percentile.
7 yr
Immutable retention of every decision and its reasoning.
Performance and accuracy figures shown on this site are measured in controlled test environments on representative datasets. Real results vary with data quality, list configuration and volume. The only binding commitments are those stated in the service agreement.
Coming in
EU CFSP hit
14:31:52 · entry 118
Hamburg register
14:31:58 · HRB match
Ownership path · 3 hops
14:32:04 · UBO resolved
Adverse media · 2 items
14:32:06 · scored 0.06
Nordwind Handels GmbH
DE-HRB-8839210045 · Hamburg, DE · inc. 2016
Score decomposition
Narrative
CriticalThe subject entity matches EU CFSP 2023/1214 on legal name and registration number. Ownership resolves in three hops to a designated ultimate beneficial owner.
Recommended action: escalate to Tier 2 with the ownership chart attached
awaiting analyst signature
Ownership, control, address, counterparty and asset. The engine walks every edge until it finds the exposure a name alone never shows, recognises the pattern behind it, and writes down why.
98%
Match accuracy
95%
False positives out
Four typologies the engine detects on the network, not on a name. Each has its own shape, and the shape is what makes it a case.
Smurfing
Many unrelated depositors paying into one account, each amount deliberately parked under the reporting threshold.
What fires it
Six different depositors on one account in nine days, none of them above the threshold on its own. No single deposit is reportable; the set is.
STRUCTURING
Many unrelated depositors paying into one account, each amount deliberately parked under the reporting threshold.
Performance and accuracy figures shown on this site are measured in controlled test environments on representative datasets. Real results vary with data quality, list configuration and volume. The only binding commitments are those stated in the service agreement.
Deepsi recognises the shape of laundering, not only the name on the list. Four of the typologies it watches continuously:
Ownership chains of three or more hops that terminate in a designated party.
3+ hops · 3 jurisdictions
Sequences of transfers deliberately parked just under the reporting threshold.
6 transfers · 94% of threshold
Funds that leave and return to the same beneficial owner through intermediaries.
cycle closed · 4 hops
Declared cargo value diverging from the market price for the same route, in either direction.
declared 41% below market
A session from an unseen device changes the beneficiary and empties the balance before the customer notices.
new device · beneficiary changed in 4 min
Many small deposits from unrelated payers converging on one account that empties the same day.
23 inbound · 1 outbound · same day
Bursts of minimum-value authorisations against a card range, looking for the ones that clear.
118 auths · 0.9 s apart · $1.00
Four typologies the engine detects on the network, not on a name. Each has its own shape, and the shape is what makes it a case.
Deepsi proposes the thresholds, works the queue, drafts the file, and learns from every decision your team signs.
04.3.aProposes matching thresholds per list and per jurisdiction, and projects the effect of each change on recall and on alert volume before you apply it.
threshold 0.62 → 0.68 · −31% alerts
04.3.bGroups duplicate hits into one case, ranks by severity and SLA, and prepares each alert with the evidence an analyst needs to decide in one pass.
1,284 alerts → 96 cases
04.3.cDrafts the risk narrative with its regulatory citations, the ownership chart and the audit trail, ready for the analyst signature and for an examiner.
SAR-ready · 7-year record
04.3.dEvery dismissal with a reason feeds the scoring model, so the pattern your team rejected today weighs less in tomorrow’s queue.
feedback loop · per tenant
Performance and accuracy figures shown on this site are measured in controlled test environments on representative datasets. Real results vary with data quality, list configuration and volume. The only binding commitments are those stated in the service agreement.
Section 05 · How it is bought
Most confusion about AML software comes from vendors selling parts as if they were products. Here the three lines nest: you pick where you start, and you move up without changing platform, data or audit record.

Lists and adverse media
For· Teams that need to check a name before onboarding it, and prove later that they checked.
Lists and adverse media

Screening + transaction monitoring
For· Regulated institutions with an AML programme and a regulator that asks how it works.
Adds over the line before
+ Screening

AML + fraud
For· Institutions where the same team, or the one next door, also answers for fraud.
Adds over the line before
+ AML
The line is what you can do. The plan is how much volume you do it on — Starter, Advanced or Enterprise. They are two separate choices and you make them independently.
See what each line costs99.99%
Uptime Reliability
Latency
0.4ms
Throughput
12.4 GB/s
Status
Optimal
Section 06 · Engine
Engineered specifically to process enormous volumes of Sanctions, Watchlist, and Adverse Media data with parallel Continuous Transaction Monitoring.
We provide API-first flexibility to suit your business. Integrate our intelligence into your preferred workflows via real-time API or batch processing.
Support fast onboarding flows and seamless customer experiences with sub-second entity resolution and risk scoring.
Built on Google Cloud, with infrastructure audited for SOC 2 Type II and certified ISO/IEC 27001. Your data travels encrypted with TLS 1.3 and is stored encrypted with AES-256.
Handle millions of annual screenings with consistent performance. Our distributed mesh architecture grows with your volume.
three customers, on the record
"Xpectra didn't just automate our screening; they defined our compliance DNA. The AI process was surprisingly intuitive."
"I've never seen a platform move this fast without compromising on regulatory precision and audit quality."
"The level of sophistication in their entity resolution engine is lightyears ahead of anything on the market."
For small teams starting an AML programme.
billed annually · $99 month-to-month
no card · $0.32 per extra entity
Full AML coverage with continuous monitoring.
billed annually · $399 month-to-month
no card · $0.19 per extra entity
For institutions with their own residency and SLA terms.
annual contract · volume pricing
24-hour response
We screen your own portfolio during the demo, and show you the file that would exist if an examiner asked for it tomorrow.